QR code for Harold Garfinkel ja etnometodologia. Title, Harold Garfinkel ja etnometodologia. Author, John Heritage. Publisher, Gaudeamus, Harold Garfinkel ja etnometodologia. John Heritage ; [suomentajat: Ilkka Arminen et al.] Gaudeamus, c Other Title. Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Harold Garfinkel, etnometodologia e o esporte coletivo. Public. · Hosted by Blog do Sociofilo. Interested. clock. Thursday, October 13, at PM –
|Published (Last):||10 June 2013|
|PDF File Size:||8.15 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.97 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Instead, these borrowings are only gsrfinkel references to theoretical works from which ethnomethodology has appropriated theoretical ideas for the expressed purposes of doing ethnomethodological investigations.
Harold Garfinkel i etnometodologia by Magda Bąk on Prezi
The confusion between the two disciplines stems, in part, from the practices of some ethnomethodologists including Garfinkelwho sift through phenomenological texts, recovering phenomenological concepts and findings relevant to their interests, and then transpose these concepts and findings to topics in the study of social order. So called phenomenological analyses of social structures that do not have prima facie reference to any of the structures of intentional consciousness should raise questions as to the phenomenological status of such analyses.
Ethnomethodology has perplexed commentators, due to its radical approach to questions of theory and method.
Articles that may contain original research from June All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from April Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers.
Sociological theories Science and technology studies Methods in sociology. June Learn how and etnometodo,ogia to remove this template message. Anderson The ethnomethodologists. The relationship between ethnomethodology and conversation analysis has been contentious at times, given their overlapping interests, the close collaboration between their founders and the subsequent divergence of interest among many practitioners. Thus, their methods for: Ethnomethodology is not Durkheimian, although it shares some of the interests of Durkheim; it is not phenomenology, although it borrows from Husserl and Schutz’s studies of the lifeworld Lebenswelt ; it is not a form of Gestalt theory, although it describes social orders as having Gestalt-like properties; and, it is not Wittgensteinian, although it makes use of Wittgenstein’s understanding of rule-use, etc.
The approach was originally developed by Harold Garfinkelwho attributed its origin to his work investigating etnometoodlogia conduct of jury members in On the other hand, the authors and theoretical references cited by Garfinkel do not constitute a rigorous theoretical basis for ethnomethodology. Anne Rawls pointed out: Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page.
Kurt WolfTransaction Publishers, This interest developed out of Garfinkel’s critique of Talcott Parsons ‘ attempt to derive a general theory of society.
The focus of the investigation used in our example is the social order of garfnikel, the ethnomethodological interest is in the “how” the methods and practices of the production and maintenance of this social order.
As Garfinkel states in regard to the work of etnomeetodologia phenomenologist Aron Gurwitsch, especially his “Field of Consciousness” When such analytical concepts are generated from within one setting and conceptually applied generalised to another, the re application represents a violation of the strong form of the unique adequacy requirement of methods.
Garfinkel speaks of phenomenological texts and findings as being “appropriated” and intentionally “misread” for the purposes of exploring topics in the study of social order. Furthermore, these practices or methods are witnessably enacted, making them available for study. In essence the distinctive difference between sociological approaches and ethnomethodology is that the latter adopts a commonsense attitude towards knowledge. In as much as the study of social orders is “inexorably intertwined” with the constitutive features of talk about those social orders, ethnomethodology is committed to an interest in both conversational talk, and the role this talk plays in the constitution of that order.
Ethnomethodology is the study of methods people use for understanding and producing the social order in which they live.
Books by Harold Garfinkel
For the ethnomethodologist, the methodic realisation of social scenes takes place within the actual setting etnometodolohia scrutiny, and is structured by the participants in that setting through the reflexive accounting of that setting’s features. To further muddy the waters, some phenomenological sociologists seize upon ethnomethodological findings as examples of applied phenomenology; this even when the results of these ethnomethodological investigations clearly do not make use of phenomenological methods, or formulate their findings in the language of phenomenology.
In contrast to traditional sociological etnometoodologia of inquiry, it is a hallmark of the ethnomethodological perspective that it does not make theoretical or methodological appeals to: According to George Psathasfive types of ethnomethodological study can be identified Psathas Sharrock, Bob Anderson, R. Lastly, there is no claim in any of Garfinkel’s work that ethnomethodology is a gartinkel of phenomenology, or phenomenological sociology.
Harold Garfinkel, etnometodologia e o esporte coletivo
tenometodologia Such methods serve to constitute the social order of being a juror for the members of the jury, as well as for researchers and other interested parties, etnomefodologia that specific social setting. With regard to theory, Garfinkel has consistently advocated an attitude of garflnkel indifference, a principled agnosticism with regard to social theory which insists that the shared understandings of members of a social setting under study take precedence over any concepts which a social theorist might bring to the analysis from outside that setting.
Ethnomethodology, Penguin, Harmondsworth, pp 15— This page was last edited on 30 Octoberat Using an appropriate Southern California example: In other projects Wikibooks. It is also naturally reflexive to and constitutive of that order. Retrieved from ” https: This section possibly contains synthesis of material which does not verifiably mention or relate to the main topic.
Even though ethnomethodology is not a form of phenomenology, the reading and understanding of phenomenological texts, and developing the capability of seeing phenomenologically is essential to the actual doing of ethnomethodological studies.
Such interpretive transpositions do not garfnkel the ethnomethodologist a phenomenologist, or ethnomethodology a form of phenomenology.
This critique originated in his reading of Alfred Schutzthough Garfinkel ultimately revised many of Schutz’s ideas. Wikibooks has a book on the topic of: Even though ethnomethodology has been characterised as having a “phenomenological sensibility”,  and reliable commentators have acknowledged that “there is a strong influence of phenomenology on ethnomethodology Since ethnomethodology has become anathema to certain sociologists, and since those practicing it like to perceive their own efforts as constituting a radical break from prior sociologies, there has been little attempt to link ethnomethodology to these prior sociologies.
John Heritage writes, “In its open-ended reference to [the study of] any kind of sense-making procedure, the term represents a signpost to a domain of uncharted dimensions rather than a staking out of a clearly delineated territory. This can be perplexing to traditional social scientists, trained in the need for social theory and a multiplicity of theoretical references by Anne Rawls, in her introduction to Ethnomethodology’s Program might be interpreted to suggest a softening of this position towards the end of Garfinkel’s life.