La tutela della dignità umana: fondamento e scopo della Convenzione di Oviedo. In: Furlan, E. Bioetica e dignità umana: Interpretazioni a. PDF on ResearchGate | On May 1, , R Andorno and others published La tutela della dignità umana: fondamento e scopo della Convenzione di Oviedo. Venti anni dopo la Convenzione di Oviedo / Equitable access, appropriate quality . Twenty years after the Oviedo Convention | Il diritto alla tutela della salute.

Author: Zolorr Tygorr
Country: Germany
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Software
Published (Last): 28 August 2005
Pages: 34
PDF File Size: 15.78 Mb
ePub File Size: 6.1 Mb
ISBN: 581-5-90042-522-7
Downloads: 22142
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Shakarn

For the most part, in this field the law intervenes “a posteriori” to evaluate in hindsight and with an outcome that is practically unforeseeable the penal implications of the situation. The author tackles the theme of the refusal on the part of a patient of a certain therapy, when such decision produces a health hazard or mortal danger.

Firme e ratifiche Riserve et Dichiarazioni Rapporto esplicativo Protocolli.

The Convention recognises also the patient’s right not to know. No categories specified categorize this paper. The treatment of persons unable to give their consent, such as children and people with mental illnesses, may be carried out only if it could produce real and direct benefit to his or her health. Additional Protocols are foreseen to clarify, strengthen and supplement the overall Convention.

If, in particular, the intent is to deduce applicable “rules” in cases such as these from the system in force, the jurist ought to perform a truly “humble act” and don the garb of the “pure” and “neutral” exegete of actual fact, abstaining from philosophical or political improvisations, and instead make oiedo effort to “set aside” personal convictions to avoid surreptitiously altering the course of reasoning. Genome Editing, Asilomar, and the Politics of Deliberation.

Greely – – American Journal of Bioethics 15 Added to PP index Total downloads 1 1, of 2, Recent downloads 6 months 1of 2, How can I increase my downloads? The only restrictions are those prescribed by law and which are necessary in a democratic society in the interest of public safety, for the prevention of crime, for the protection of public health or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.

La sola eccezione si ha, a certe condizioni, convenzkone il prelievo oviddo tessuti rigenerabili tra fratelli e sorelle.


Nevertheless, at the time when a practical decision vonvenzione imperative the physician might look in vain for guidance in legal theory and practice, which up to now have proved capable only of providing a highly contradictory gamut of solutions: The Convention stipulates that all patients have a right to be informed about their health, including the results of predictive genetic tests.


The Convention sets out rules related to medical research by including detailed and precise conditions, especially for people who cannot give their consent. La Convenzione vieta ogni forma di discriminazione nei confronti di una persona in base al suo patrimonio genetico e autorizza test genetici solo a fini medici. The Convention states the principle according to which a person has to give the necessary consent for treatment expressly, in advance, except in emergencies, and that such consent may be freely withdrawn at any time.

Rodriguez – – Journal of Clinical Convenzjone and Bioethics 7 2. Un intervento su persone incapaci di dare il proprio consenso, per esempio su un minore o su una persona sofferente di turbe mentali, non deve essere eseguito, salvo che non produca un reale e sicuro vantaggio per la sua salute.

It lays ovviedo a series of principles and prohibitions concerning bioethics, medical research, consent, rights to private life and information, organ transplantation, public debate etc.

Treaty Office on http: Scienza E Filosofia Wade – – Bioessays 39 Ben Merriman – – American Journal of Bioethics 15 The author finds a similar variety of views in doctrine. The Model T of Biotechnology.

Neri Demetrio, Crispr-Cas9, la convenzione di Oviedo e le generazioni future – PhilPapers

The Convention recognises the importance of promoting a public convenzuone and consultation on these questions. Ufficio dei Trattati, http: Essa permette interventi di ingegneria genetica solo per ragioni preventive, diagnostiche o terapeutiche e solo quando il suo scopo non sia di modificare il patrimonio genetico di una persona.

On the other hand, health care imposed by force, however conceived and carried out, evidently will assume the characteristics of a violent act particularly humiliating not just because aimed at the “body” of convennzione patient, but above all because bound to downgrade the most deeply-rooted convictions of the interested party: It prohibits the use of techniques of medically assisted procreation to help choose the sex of a child, except where it would avoid a serious hereditary condition.

Request removal from index. Cases of this type pose a dramatic dilemma.

Rivisteweb: Article Details

No keywords specified fix it. On one side of the issue is the essentially dominant approach, which deduces from the clear expression contained in Art. It prohibits the creation of human embryos for research purposes and requires an adequate convenzone of embryos where countries allow in-vitro research. Stephan Guttinger – – Science and Engineering Ethics 24 4: Traduzioni ordinati per lingue non ufficiali. Signatures and ratifications Reservations and declarations Explanatory report Protocols.


Monthly iviedo Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart. La Convenzione riconosce anche il diritto del paziente a non essere informato.

The Convention prohibits the removal of organs and other tissues which cannot be regenerated from people not able to give consent. The Convention is the first legally-binding international text designed to preserve human dignity, rights and freedoms, through a series of principles and prohibitions against the misuse of biological and medical advances.

In actual fact, the responsibility for the handling of such problematic matters falls entirely to the physician.

The treaty allows genetic engineering only for preventive, diagnostic or therapeutic dj and only where it does not aim to change the genetic make-up of a person’s descendants.

In his reconstruction of the voiedo positions, the author shows how jurisprudence oscillates between the extremes of the identification of compulsory “atypical” measures useful to the physician in fulfilling his duty to safeguard health even “contra voluntatem”, and the recognition of an absolute and pre-eminent significance to the refusal of medical care, even when such cannot be confirmed owing to the patient’s state of unconsciousness.

Human Genome Editing and Ethical Considerations.

For the most part, respect for the will of the patient will be experienced by the physician as a sort of “facilitation” of self-destructive behaviour intrinsically contradictory with respect to the original sense of the medical profession.

The greater the patient’s chances of being able to return to a normal life, and the more irrational the reasons for the refusal appear to be, the more difficult it is for the physician to respect such a refusal. Ovuedo on Human Rights and Biomedicine.